Lois E. Ordlock - Page 20

                                        - 20 -                                        
          Mr. Ordlock had been personally liable to a nongovernment                   
          creditor, the community assets would have been a potential source           
          of payment to that creditor.                                                
               The question is whether Congress intended to place the                 
          Commissioner at a disadvantage concerning liabilities such as Mr.           
          Ordlock’s.  As we have stated, we see no evidence of such                   
          congressional intent, nor do we see petitioner’s position as                
          advantageous to tax administration given the problems discussed             
          previously.  The nature of a marital community in California is             
          to generally allow the individual debts of the spouses to be                
          collected out of community assets.  Cal. Fam. Code sec. 910 (West           
          2004); McIntyre v. United States, supra; Babb v. Schmidt, 496               
          F.2d 957 (9th Cir. 1974); Weinberg v. Weinberg, 432 P.2d 709,               
          713-714 (Cal. 1967); Grolemund v. Cafferata, 111 P.2d 641 (Cal.             
          1941).6  The policies behind the law can be debated, but a                  
          decision not to disrupt this rule for tax liabilities is sound.             
          A marital community can involve many sources of income, many                
          assets, and many expenses.  How these expenses are paid, how the            
          income is handled, and how assets are acquired are all choices of           
          the spouses.7  Attempts to undo these choices and determine the             

               6The California Supreme Court in Grolemund v. Cafferata,               
          111 P.2d 641 (Cal. 1941), expressly distinguished California’s              
          community property law from the “community debt” and “separate              
          debt” positions of Washington and Arizona.                                  
               7Community property rights are equal regardless of which               
          spouse acquires the property.  The following describes the nature           
                                                              (continued...)          




Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011