Lois E. Ordlock - Page 14

                                        - 14 -                                        
               The House conference report indicates that the reason for              
          the 2000 technical correction was as follows:                               
                    Allowance of refunds.--The current placement in                   
               the statute * * * may inappropriately suggest that the                 
               provision applies only to the United States Tax Court,                 
               whereas it was intended to apply administratively and                  
               in all courts.  The bill clarifies this by moving the                  
               provision to its own subsection.  [H. Conf. Rept. 106-                 
               1033, at 1023 (2000), 2000-3 C.B. 304, 353.]                           
          Accordingly, the original intent of section 6015(e)(3) remains              
          useful for our purposes.  In that regard, the House report’s                
          initial explanation of the refund provisions in section 6015 is             
          pertinent:  “The Tax Court may order refunds as appropriate where           
          it determines the spouse qualifies for relief and an overpayment            
          exists as a result of the innocent spouse qualifying for such               
          relief.”  H. Rept. 105-364 (Part 1), supra at 61, 1998-3 C.B. at            
          433.                                                                        
               Similar to the language modifying “determination” in the               
          current version of section 6015(e), this Court’s authority under            
          section 6015(g)(1) to refund an overpayment flows from our                  
          “determination” of relief from joint and several tax liability.             
                    5.  “[N]otwithstanding any other law or rule of law”              
               Respondent argues that pursuant to section 6321, a lien                
          attaches to the entire amount of the Ordlocks’ community                    
          property, and thus, no refund of community property can be                  
          granted.  The Federal tax lien statute does not create property             
          rights but merely imposes consequences, Federally defined, to               
          rights created under State law.  United States v. Craft, 535 U.S.           




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011