Lois E. Ordlock - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          Given these allegations, petitioner prayed that                             
               this Court may hear the case and determine (i) that                    
               Petitioner is entitled to relief from all joint and                    
               several liability on the joint returns of Petitioner                   
               and her spouse for each of the 1982, 1983, and 1984 tax                
               years, in the full amount of such liability that was                   
               unpaid as of July 22, 1998, and (ii) that Petitioner is                
               further entitled to relief from all joint and several                  
               liability for interest, penalties, and other amounts                   
               attributable to such unpaid (as of July 22, 1998)                      
               liability, and (iii) that the Court grant such other                   
               and further relief to which Petitioner may be entitled.                
          In short, petitioner’s petition took issue with the scope of the            
          section 6015(b) relief granted to petitioner in the notice of               
          determination.3                                                             
               At trial, on January 5, 2004, the parties made a joint                 
          motion for leave to submit case under Tax Court Rule 122, which             
          the Court granted.                                                          
               The parties agree that petitioner is entitled to section               
          6015(b) relief from joint and several liability for the taxable             
          years 1982, 1983, and 1984.  The parties further agree that the             
          application of section 6015(b) causes petitioner to have a                  
          Federal income tax liability (including interest, penalties, and            
          other amounts) of zero for those years.                                     






               3 We note that the issue of whether petitioner is entitled             
          to a refund was not specifically raised in the petition but was             
          subsequently raised and briefed by the parties.                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011