Lois E. Ordlock - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          1982, 1983, and 1984, for which she and her spouse (Mr. Ordlock)            
          filed joint Federal income tax returns.  The following table                
          provides the specific adjustments for each taxable year in issue            
          as stated in the notice of determination:                                   
                              Amount of relief Amount of relief   Amount of           
               Tax Period(s)   you requested    we could allowtax remaining             
               12/31/1982           $314            ($621)  -0-                       
              12/31/1983     80,081          54,208            -0-                   
               12/31/1984     132,606            132,601            -0-               
          The notice of determination further specifies that “We’ve granted           
          your request in full, you don’t have to take any further action.”           
               On November 1, 2002, the date the petition was filed,                  
          petitioner resided in Anaheim, California.2  In her petition,               
          petitioner, through her attorney, alleged that                              
               The Commissioner has apparently determined to allow                    
               Petitioner’s request in full, but the Notice [of                       
               determination] does not expressly state that                           
               Petitioner’s request is allowed in full, and the Notice                
               [of determination] contains various erroneous amounts                  
               and calculations which misstate and miscalculate the                   
               amounts of relief for which Petitioner is eligible                     
               under Code Section 6015(b).  The effect of these                       
               misstatements and miscalculations is that the Notice                   
               [of determination] does not allow Petitioner’s request                 
               for relief in full.  Therefore, this petition is                       
               necessary in order to verify that the Commissioner                     
               intended to allow Petitioner’s request in full and to                  
               correctly determine and state the full amount of relief                
               for which Petitioner is eligible under Code Section                    
               6015(b).                                                               





               2We note that petitioner’s petition was postmarked Oct. 24,            
          2002, and was therefore timely.                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011