Swallows Holding, Ltd. - Page 87

                                        -43-                                          
          without the benefit of any deductions.  On October 7, 1993, the             
          taxpayer submitted Federal income tax returns for 1987 through              
          1991; apparently, these returns were never filed by the                     
          Commissioner.  The returns reported net losses from rental                  
          properties located in the United States.  On January 13, 1994,              
          the Commissioner issued a notice of deficiency to the taxpayer              
          for 1987 through 1991.  The Commissioner determined in the notice           
          of deficiency that the taxpayer was liable for deficiencies and             
          additions to tax as ascertained from the substitute returns.                
          Pursuant to section 874(a), the Commissioner did not allow the              
          taxpayer to deduct any of his related expenses.13                           
               This Court upheld the Commissioner’s determination, deciding           
          that a nonresident alien may not avoid the sanctions of section             
          874(a) by filing returns after the Commissioner has prepared                
          returns for the taxpayer, but before the Commissioner has issued            
          a notice of deficiency.  See Espinosa v. Commissioner, supra at             
          150, 158.  The Court noted that the Commissioner before preparing           
          the substitute returns had informed the taxpayer that he had not            
          filed a Federal income tax return and had given him a reasonable            
          time to do so.  Id. at 157.                                                 


               13 Although the Commissioner in the notice of deficiency had           
          characterized the taxpayer’s rental income as effectively                   
          connected income, the Court was careful to note that neither                
          party in that case had questioned whether the taxpayer had made a           
          valid election to support that characterization.  See Espinosa v.           
          Commissioner, 107 T.C. 146, 150 (1996).                                     




Page:  Previous  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011