Gary Lee Colvin - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Gary Lee Colvin, pro se.                                               
               Daniel N. Price, for respondent.                                       


                       MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION                        

               WHERRY, Judge:  This case is before the Court on a petition            
          for judicial review of a notice of deficiency that determined a             
          $13,018 deficiency for petitioner’s 2000 taxable year.1  After              
          concessions by both parties,2 the issues for decision are:                  

               1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to             
          the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and              
          all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.                                                                  
               2Petitioner received a Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement,               
          from Technology Integration Group (TIG) which reflected that he             
          received wages of $12,004 in 2000.  Petitioner also received a              
          W-2 from Daou Systems Inc. (Daou Systems) which reflected that he           
          received an $8,000 settlement in 2000.  Petitioner included the             
          $20,004 on line 1 of his 2000 Schedule C, Profit or Loss From               
          Business.  However, petitioner then took deductions that exactly            
          matched his income from TIG and Daou Systems.  Petitioner                   
          deducted $12,004 and $8,000 on Part V, Other Expenses, of his               
          Schedule C.  Respondent disallowed the deductions.  Petitioner              
          did not address these issues at trial or offer any evidence                 
          relating to them.  Accordingly, these deductions are deemed                 
          conceded by petitioner.  See Rule 142 (burden of proof generally            
          on taxpayer); Rule 149(b) (party’s failure to produce evidence,             
          in support of issue of fact as to which party has burden of                 
          proof, may be ground for determination of issue against that                
          party).                                                                     
               Respondent conceded that petitioner is entitled to the                 
          following Schedule C, line 17 deductions for his 2000 taxable               
          year:  (1) District Court appeal costs for Colvin v. O’Connor,              
          70 F.3d 530 (9th Cir. 1995), in the amount of $105; (2) Central             
          Valley Reporters transcripts costs in the amount of $197; and               
          (3) legal fees and costs for Colvin v. Daou Sys. Inc., No. 97-CV-           
                                                             (continued...)           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007