Gary Lee Colvin - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business, petitioner listed                 
          “Consultant” as his principal business or profession, and “Colvin           
          Business Services II” as the name of his business.  Petitioner              
          reported his gross receipts or sales as $20,004 and did not check           
          the box on line 1 of his Schedule C to indicate that the income             
          was reported on a Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, that had the            
          statutory employee box checked.  On petitioner’s 2000 Form W-2,             
          TIG did not check the box on line 15 to indicate that petitioner            
          was a statutory employee.  Petitioner claimed a total of $52,968            
          in expenses and costs of goods sold.6  Petitioner’s Schedule C              
          indicated a net loss of $32,964.                                            
               Petitioner owned two vehicles, a 1997 Volkswagen Cabriolet             
          and a 1997 Honda Accord.  He claimed a car and truck expense of             
          $6,033 on Schedule C of his 2000 Form 1040.  On Schedule C Part             


               5(...continued)                                                        
          security numbers, as well as the full names of his minor                    
          children, and phone numbers.”  Petitioner also objected to the              
          admission into evidence of his 1997, 2001, 2002, and 2003,                  
          Federal income tax returns on the same grounds, and relevancy.              
          Although the Court, on January 16, 2007, proposed amendments to             
          its Rules of Practice and Procedure that would provide in Rule              
          22.2 for the redaction of Social Security numbers and minor                 
          children’s names, the proposed amendments have not yet been                 
          adopted.  Further, petitioner has not filed a motion to redact              
          the Social Security numbers and minor children’s names, or to               
          seal that portion of the record.  The Court concludes that                  
          petitioner’s 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003, Federal income tax           
          returns are admissible in their current form.                               
               6Petitioner’s total expenses of $52,968 consisted of $46,454           
          in general expenses, $3,323 in cost of goods sold, and $3,191 for           
          business use of his home.                                                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007