-251- agreement with Kanter, Lisle assisted Schaffel by approving a number of financing deals between Travelers and Walters for various development projects. Schaffel remitted one payment to IRA arising from a Travelers financing deal that he brokered shortly after Lisle began working at Travelers. Schaffel then balked at making any additional payments to IRA. A dispute between Schaffel and Kanter ensued, and Kanter convinced Schaffel that he was obliged to continue to share with Kanter any fees and commissions that he might earn on Travelers financing transactions. At this point, Schaffel did not want to remit any further payments to IRA, and Kanter directed Schaffel to make his payments to THC. Although Schaffel remitted his payments to either IRA or THC, those entities were used only as conduits to appease Schaffel’s concerns over the legality of sharing broker’s fees with a nonbroker. There is no evidence in the record that anyone representing IRA or THC was “instrumental or helpful” in obtaining financing from Prudential or Travelers for Walters’s development projects or in obtaining Prudential construction contracts for Torcon. Schaffel understood that Kanter himself would exert influence in an attempt to obtain Prudential and Travelers business for Schaffel and his clients. We conclude Kanter obtained such business from Prudential with the help of BallardPage: Previous 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011