-246- Weaver’s effort to influence Lisle was successful. Unexpectedly, Intercontinental Co., one of the bidders, withdrew at the last minute and did not attend the bid meeting. A second bidder, Del Webb, who surprisingly attended the meeting in person (as opposed to sending a representative), refused to submit a bid because he believed he had already been awarded the contract. In the absence of a competing bid, Hyatt Corp. was awarded the Embarcadero Hotel management contract on the same terms on which it had agreed to manage the Houston Hyatt Hotel. The record reflects that Weaver did much more than simply influence Lisle to permit Hyatt Corp. to submit a bid on the Embarcadero Hotel management contract. After Hyatt Corp. won the Embarcadero Hotel management contract, Hyatt Corp. entered into an agreement to pay 10 percent of Hyatt Corp.’s annual “net cash profits” from the contract to KWJ Corp., Weaver’s closely held corporation. The Hyatt/KWJ agreement stated that Weaver “has been the principal factor in bringing the parties together and aiding in the negotiations” with regard to the Embarcadero Hotel management contract. In addition, the Hyatt/KWJ agreement was executed under the unusual circumstances that initially only A.N. Pritzker and his two sons knew the agreement existed. When other Hyatt Corp. executives later investigated the matter (including Friend--A.N. Pritzker’s son-in-law), they determined the Hyatt/KWJ agreement represented a reward to Weaver for hisPage: Previous 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011