Jean Mathia and Estate of Doyle V. Mathia, Deceased, Jean Mathia, Personal Representative - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioner Jean Mathia resided in Grove, Oklahoma, when she            
          petitioned this Court on her own behalf and as personal                     
          representative of the Estate of Doyle V. Mathia, her deceased               
          husband.  Doyle V. Mathia (Mr. Mathia) and petitioner were                  
          married and filed joint income tax returns for all relevant tax             
          years.  Mr. Mathia died on February 19, 2000.                               
               Mr. Mathia was a limited partner in Greenwich Associates               
          (Greenwich), a New York limited partnership subject to the                  
          unified audit and litigation procedures of the Tax Equity and               
          Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub. L. 97-248, sec.             
          402(a), 96 Stat. 648, for the relevant tax years.  He owned an              
          8.484-percent limited partnership interest in Greenwich at all              
          relevant times.  Kevin Smith was the general partner and tax                
          matters partner (the TMP) of Greenwich.2                                    
               On August 3, 1990, the Commissioner issued Greenwich a                 
          Notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment for 1982              
          through 1984.  The TMP timely filed a petition for review in this           
          Court pursuant to section 6226 (the Greenwich litigation).3  On             


               2Sec. 6224(c)(3) authorizes the tax matters partner of a               
          partnership, as defined by the Code, to enter into a settlement             
          agreement that is binding on all partners who are not notice                
          partners or members of a notice group, i.e., those partners not             
          entitled to notice of administrative proceedings with respect to            
          the partnership.                                                            
               3Docket No. 24102-90.                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011