Carmelo Montalbano - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
         States, 360 F.2d 353, 355 (4th Cir. 1965).  Hence, the criminal              
         conviction necessarily established the requisite wrongful intent             
         for purposes of the civil sanction.  Amos v. Commissioner, supra;            
         see also Tomlinson v. Lefkowitz, supra at 265.                               
              Under well-established judicial precedents, for purposes of             
         applying collateral estoppel, it is immaterial that petitioner’s             
         conviction resulted from a plea of guilty to the criminal charges            
         brought against him rather than from a trial on the merits after             
         a plea of not guilty.  “A guilty plea is as much a conviction as             
         a conviction following jury trial.”  Gray v. Commissioner, supra             
         at 246.  A guilty plea constitutes an admission of all the                   
         elements of the criminal charge.  McCarthy v. United States, 394             
         U.S. 459, 466 (1969).  “Once accepted by a court, it is the                  
         voluntary plea of guilt itself, with its intrinsic admission of              
         each element of the crime, that triggers the collateral                      
         consequences attending that plea.”  Blohm v. Commissioner, 994               
         F.2d 1542, 1554 (11th Cir. 1993), affg. T.C. Memo. 1991-636; see             
         Manzoli v. Commissioner, 904 F.2d 101, 105 (1st Cir. 1990), affg.            
         T.C. Memo. 1989-49 and T.C. Memo. 1988-299; Ivers v. United                  
         States, 581 F.2d 1362, 1367 (9th Cir. 1978); Brazzell v. Adams,              
         493 F.2d 489, 490 (5th Cir. 1974); Plunkett v. Commissioner, 465             
         F.2d 299, 307 (7th Cir. 1972), affg. T.C. Memo. 1970-274; Metros             
         v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 441 F.2d 313, 317 (10th Cir. 1970); DiLeo v.              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008