- 15 - after the decision had been entered. Petitioner, however, did not raise relief under subsection (c) during the prior proceeding. Whether Petitioner Participated Meaningfully in the Prior Proceeding Petitioner bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that she did not participate meaningfully in the prior proceeding. See Monsour v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004- 190. At trial, petitioner’s counsel conceded that petitioner participated meaningfully in the prior proceeding relating to 1995 and 1996 up to April of 2000, or about a month before the death of Mr. Pacheco. Petitioner’s counsel argued that after April of 2000, petitioner did not participate “meaningfully” because the remaining actions that were required to conclude the proceeding for 1995 and 1996 were ministerial. Court cases have not clearly defined “meaningful participation” in all respects. Huynh v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-180. Nevertheless, the Court has held that signing Court documents and participating in settlement negotiations are indicators of meaningful participation. Id.; Monsour v. Commissioner, supra. It is not disputed that petitioner communicated with respondent on numerous occasions in the prior proceeding, in person and by phone, to discuss settlement and to voluntarily sign court documents.Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007