- 28 - advice was in error, we note that Ms. Clark had no prior relationship with Renaissance. On the facts of this case, we find Mrs. Smith’s reliance on Ms. Clark was reasonable. Accordingly, we decline to sustain respondent’s determination as to the accuracy-related penalties. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent as to the deficiencies and for petitioners as to the accuracy-related penalties.Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28Last modified: November 10, 2007