Estate of Anna Mirowski, Deceased, Ginat W. Mirowski and Ariella Rosengard, Personal Representatives - Page 39




                                       - 39 -                                         
               At all relevant times, including after Ms. Mirowski’s death,           
          MFV has been a valid functioning investment operation and has               
          been managing business matters relating to the ICD patents and              
          the ICD patents license agreement, including related litigation.            
          As Ms. Mirowski had hoped, her daughters, in their capacities as            
          officers of MFV and as trustees of MFV’s members, have actively             
          worked together to manage MFV’s assets.  Ms. Mirowski’s daughters           
          have held meetings with representatives of Goldman Sachs approxi-           
          mately three to four times a year in order to review MFV’s                  
          Goldman Sachs’ account performance and asset allocation and to              
          determine what, if any, changes should be made in the future.               
          For at least one of those meetings each year, all of Ms.                    
          Mirowski’s daughters have been present in person.  For the                  
          several other meetings each year, the daughters have met together           
          in person or have participated in a meeting by teleconference.              
          All of Ms. Mirowski’s daughters jointly have made investment                
          decisions for MFV and plan to have each of their respective                 
          children also become involved in such decisionmaking when they              
          reach the appropriate age.  In addition, Ms. Mirowski’s daughters           
          have worked together on matters concerning the business of                  
          managing the ICD patents, the ICD patents license agreement, and            
          related litigation.  At the time of the trial in this case, there           
          was substantial ongoing litigation relating to those patents and            
          that license agreement with respect to which Ms. Mirowski’s                 







Page:  Previous  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008