Joyce A. Perkins - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          includes amounts received as alimony or separate maintenance                
          payments.”).                                                                
               For Federal income tax purposes, alimony is defined as any             
          payment in cash that satisfies all of the following four                    
          requirements: (a) Such payment is received by, or on behalf of, a           
          spouse under a divorce or separation instrument; (b) the divorce            
          or separation instrument does not designate such payment as a               
          payment which is not includable in gross income under section 71            
          and not allowable as a deduction under section 215; (c) the payee           
          spouse and the payor spouse are not members of the same household           
          at the time the payment is made; and (d) there is no liability to           
          make any such payment, or a substitute for such payment, in cash            
          or property, after the death of the payee spouse.  Sec.                     
          71(b)(1)(A)-(D).  The characterization of the payments as                   
          “alimony” in the divorce or separation instrument does not                  
          establish whether those payments are treated as alimony for                 
          Federal income tax purposes; the test is whether the four                   
          statutory requirements are met.  See Hoover v. Commissioner, 102            
          F.3d 842, 844 (6th Cir. 1996) (“The mere use of the word                    
          ‘alimony’ does not affect the tax consequences of payments.”),              
          affg. T.C. Memo. 1995-183.                                                  
               In this case, the first three requirements of section                  
          71(b)(1) are clearly satisfied with respect to the payments at              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008