- 2 - 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case. This case arises from respondent’s notice of deficiency for the taxable year 1998, in which respondent determined a $6,012 deficiency in self-employment tax and a $1,202 section 6662 penalty. This case involves income Mr. Rusten earned as a consultant in the railroad business. Mr. Rusten’s consulting activities were primarily in Canada, and the difficulties in verifying the expenses Mr. Rusten incurred on behalf of his clients made this case factually complex. The self-employment tax is the only tax liability in question because respondent allowed a foreign tax credit, which eliminated petitioners’2 basic income tax liability. On the record before us, we must decide: (1) Whether Mr. Rusten’s self-employment income for 1998 is taxable in the United States; (2) whether petitioners’ cost of goods sold was greater than the amount respondent allowed; and (3) whether petitioners are liable for a penalty under section 6662. 1(...continued) the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2While Suzan Veronica Rusten is now deceased, references to “petitioners” are to Robert Louis Rusten and Suzan Veronica Rusten.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008