Robert Louis Rusten and Suzan Veronica Rusten, Deceased, Kelly Farrier, Personal Representative - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
                                     Background                                       
               The trial of this case was held over 2 days during which Mr.           
          Rusten and his administrative assistant testified, and the                  
          parties stipulated certain exhibits into the record.                        
               Mr. Rusten was a citizen and a resident of the United States           
          during 1998, but he worked in Canada as a consultant in the                 
          railroad industry.  Mr. Rusten was an independent contractor                
          associated with a company called CLN Industries International               
          (CLN).  Mr. Rusten assisted railroad companies by purchasing                
          machinery such as locomotives, generators, and traction motors              
          for them and by training their employees to make repairs and                
          maintain the locomotives and cars.                                          
               Despite the fact that Mr. Rusten considered himself an                 
          independent contractor and was taxed as such in the United                  
          States, in Canada Mr. Rusten was taxed as an employee of CLN.               
          CLN withheld the American equivalent of $21,011.53 of income                
          taxes from Mr. Rusten’s compensation and paid them to the Canada            
          Revenue Agency.  The income taxes withheld were reported on a               
          T4A-NR, Statement of Fees, Commissions, or Other Amounts Paid to            
          Non-Residents for Services Rendered in Canada.  The Canadian                
          Government retained these withheld income taxes.                            
               Petitioners timely filed their 1998 Federal income tax                 
          return.  Petitioners’ return was audited for the taxable year               
          1998.  After the first audit, the parties reached an agreement              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008