Robert Louis Rusten and Suzan Veronica Rusten, Deceased, Kelly Farrier, Personal Representative - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         
          that resulted in an increase in petitioners’ taxable income by              
          $12,385 as a result of an adjustment decreasing cost of goods               
          sold by $15,182 and other adjustments that reduced taxable                  
          income.                                                                     
               After the second audit, respondent issued a notice of                  
          deficiency that increased petitioners’ taxable self-employment              
          income by an additional $68,638, primarily because of adjustments           
          increasing by $70,572 the net profit reported on Schedule C,                
          Profit or Loss From Business.  Respondent based these adjustments           
          on a series of deposits into petitioners’ business checking                 
          accounts totaling $146,362.  The second audit also resulted in              
          the allowance of a foreign tax credit of $19,030, which                     
          eliminated petitioners’ regular income tax liability.                       
               Respondent also reduced the cost of goods sold for 1998 to             
          $5,818 after the first audit.  Exhibits and testimony at trial              
          establish that this cost of goods sold figure does not include              
          many of the expenses Mr. Rusten incurred buying equipment and               
          materials for the railroads for which he provided consulting                
          services.  There was a great deal of testimony offered about                
          other possible cost of goods sold items, but the records of                 
          income and expense petitioners produced at trial were                       
          disorganized and incomplete.                                                
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent also determined that           
          petitioners were liable for a penalty under section 6662.                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008