Interference No. 102,922
Interference No. 103,088
In addition, the following pending motions are presented for
our
consideration:
5. The Dumas 37 CFR § 1.635 motion requesting
consideration of Dumas Exhibits, DX 15-21.
6. The Gill motion to suppress.
7. In ‘088, Gill motion to strike Dumas’brief and Dumas
motion to file a substitute brief.
I.
Preliminary matter
Initially, we note that even before Gill filed his
testimony, Dumas filed a motion to strike [sic: suppress] the
testimony of Dr. Scott (Paper Nos. 77 (‘922) and 62 (‘088)).
Gill offered the Scott testimony to show no reduction to
practice by Dumas. Since, we do not reach issue 2 (above) in
this decision, the Dumas motion is dismissed as moot. Had we
reached that issue, the Dumas motion would also have been
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007