Interference No. 102,922 Interference No. 103,088 formulation should be stricken because it was based on an unmarked document. As to (1) and (2)(b) and (c), the motion to suppress is dismissed for failure to comply with 37 CFR § 1.685(d). 37 CFR § 1.685(d) states that “an objection to ...admissibility of evidence is waived unless an objection is made on the record at the deposition stating the specific ground of objection.” While Gill placed an objection on the record with respect to DX 15- 21 as not complying with 37 CFR § 1.673(b), Gill failed to place any objection on the record with respect to DXs 4-7, 9 and 17-20 for the reasons now alleged. As to (2)(a) and (3), the motion is denied. DX 22 was submitted by Dumas as part of his 37 CFR § 1.682 notice. Gill filed an objection to DX 22 urging that the document should not be admitted because it was incomplete and irrelevant. Gill's argument as to adequacy of the evidence goes to weight and not 12Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007