Interference No. 102,922 Interference No. 103,088 in relying upon these exhibits served during the Dumas testimony period prior to the taking of any deposition testimony with respect thereto. The record clearly shows that while these exhibits were not provided to Gill as part of Dumas' 37 CFR § 1.673(b) list prior to the start of deposition testimony, these exhibits were provided to Gill prior to the taking of deposition testimony with respect to them. Gill in opposing the motion, argues that the delay in his receiving the exhibits did not allow him adequate time to prepare for cross-examination of the witnesses or to consult his experts. However, the only objection in the record raised by Gill was that these documents were late-marked and not part of the 37 CFR § 1.673(b) notice. Gill did not voice any objection on the record that he did not have adequate time nor did he request additional time to prepare for cross- examination and to consult with his experts with respect to DXs 17 through 21. Accordingly, Gill's opposition is without merit. 10Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007