Interference No. 102,922
Interference No. 103,088
dismissed since Dumas did not file a motion to suppress with
his brief as required by rule, 37 CFR § 1.656(h) nor did he
raise in his brief the earlier filed motion to suppress.
Accordingly, the comment in the Dumas reply brief that the
motion to strike is incorporated therein is not entitled to
consideration.
II.
Item 7
The Dumas motion to file a substitute brief is granted
and
the Gill motion to strike is dismissed as moot.
III.
Item 5: Dumas 37 CFR § 1.635 motion
Dumas filed a 37 CFR § 1.635 motion requesting
consideration of certain exhibits DX 15 - 21 (Paper No. 48 in
'922 and No. 33
in '088). The motion stands opposed (Paper No. 51 in '922 and
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007