Ex parte PERSHADSINGH et al. - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                       
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a                 
               law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                          
                                                                                            Paper No. 35                           

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                         _____________                                                             
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                         _____________                                                             
                                          Ex parte HARRIHAR A. PERSHADSINGH                                                        
                                                 and THEODORE W. KURTZ                                                             
                                                         _____________                                                             
                                                       Appeal No. 95-0885                                                          
                                                     Application 07/725,3271                                                       
                                                        ______________                                                             
                                                 HEARD: OCTOBER 14, 1997                                                           
                                                       _______________                                                             
               Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
               WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           


                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner's final rejection of                   
               claims 1-7 and 9-18.  We affirm-in-part.                                                                            





                       Application for patent filed July 8, 1991.  According to applicants, this Application is a continuation-in-part1                                                                                                          
               of Application 07/421,102, filed October 13, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 5,053,420, granted October 1, 1991.          
                                                                -1-                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007