THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte EDITH MATHIOWITZ and ROBERT S. LANGER _____________ Appeal No. 95-2876 Application 07/906,4031 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1Application for patent filed July 1, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/603,913 filed October 24, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/348,795 filed May 8, 1989, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/045,840 filed May 1, 1987, now U.S. Patent No. 4,861,627 granted August 29, 1989. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007