THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EDITH MATHIOWITZ
and ROBERT S. LANGER
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2876
Application 07/906,4031
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and ELLIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed July 1, 1992. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/603,913 filed October 24, 1990, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application 07/348,795 filed May 8, 1989, now
abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/045,840 filed May 1, 1987, now U.S. Patent No. 4,861,627
granted August 29, 1989.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007