Appeal No. 95-2876
Application 07/906,403
(3) Claims 20 and 22 through 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the disclosure of Appelgren ; and 2
(4) Claim 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over the disclosure of Beck.
DISCUSSION
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced
by appellants and the examiner in support of their respective
positions, reference is made to the Brief and the Answer for
the full exposition thereof.
For the reasons set forth below, we will sustain only the
last three rejections indicated above and, pursuant to the
provisions of 37 CFR § 196(b), will enter a new ground of
rejection against claims 20 through 23.
1. Preliminary Matter
2The examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claim 21
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the disclosure of Appelgren. See
page 2 of the Answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007