Appeal No. 95-3598
Application 08/125,671
specification which fails to provide an adequate written
description of
the invention and fails to adequately teach how to make the
invention. In addition, with regard to independent claims 1
and 11 and the claims which depend therefrom, the examiner urges
that the specification, as originally filed, fails to provide
support for the invention as now claimed.
Claims 1, 11 through 13 and 18 through 20 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the
Fisher publication.
Claims 4, 7 through 10, 14 through 17 and 21 through 25
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
the Fisher publication as applied to claims 1, 11 through 13
and 18 through 20 above, and further in view of Zarudiansky and
Vise.
Rather than reiterate the examiner's full statement
of the above-noted rejections and the conflicting viewpoints
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007