THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TAKUO WATANABE, YASUHITO NARUSE
and KOTARO YAMASUE
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3865
Application 07/714,5681
______________
HEARD: November 13, 1997
_______________
Before GARRIS, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection dated Nov. 2, 1993. The final rejection involved
claims 1-8, 10 and 12-23. Subsequent to the final rejection,
appellants submitted two amendments. The amendment dated Feb. 2,
1994 (Paper No. 10) was denied entry by the examiner in the
Advisory Action dated Feb. 14, 1994 (Paper No. 11). The
1 Application for patent filed June 13, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007