Appeal No. 95-3865 Application 07/714,568 amendment dated Feb. 24, 1994 (Paper No. 13), was entered by the examiner as noted in the Advisory Action dated March 18, 1994 (Paper No. 14). Therefore, the claims on appeal are claims 6-8, 12-20, 22, 26 and 27, which are the only claims remaining in this application. According to appellants, the invention is directed to a presensitized plate useful in lithographic printing which comprises a roughened and anodized aluminum support covered by a positive working light-sensitive layer wherein the dye concentration is lower in the portion of the layer adjacent to or near the substrate than in the other portions of the light- sensitive layer (brief, pages 2-3). As noted by appellants, the use of these plates can significantly diminish color stain and contamination during printing, without sacrificing printing durability (brief, page 4). Independent claims 26 and 27 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are attached as an appendix to this decision. The following references have been relied upon by the examiner as evidence of obviousness: Nishioka et al. (Nishioka) 4,497,888 Feb. 5, 1985 Uehara et al. (Uehara) 4,536,465 Aug. 20, 1985 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007