THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DONALD P. McCONNELL and WILLIAM R. McINTYRE
____________
Appeal No. 95-3891
Application 08/066,4051
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision in an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner's rejection of claims 1-12, all of appellants'
Application for patent filed May 24, 1993. According to1
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/164,314, filed March 4, 1988, which is a continuation-in-part
of Application 06/739,357, filed May 30, 1985, now Patent No.
4,774,511, issued September 27, 1988.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007