THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES C. ERSKINE and DALE L. PARTIN
____________
Appeal No. 96-0550
Application 07/960,1481
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 10, 29 and 33. Claims 1-9, 11-28 and
30-32 have been canceled.
Application for patent filed October 13, 1992.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007