THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 43
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KI-YONG KIM
____________
Appeal No. 96-3211
Application 07/928,717
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before BARRETT, FLEMING, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FINDINGS OF FACT
We have reviewed the record in its entirety in light of the
arguments of Applicant and the examiner. Our decision presumes
familiarity with the entire record. A preponderance of the
evidence of record supports each of the following fact findings.
1 Counsel for Applicant failed to appear for the hearing
scheduled for 9 a.m. on 5 August 1997. Cf. Paper 42 entitled
"Transmittal of Confirmation of Oral Hearing Attendance".
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007