Appeal No. 96-3211
Application 07/928,717
the specification. The examiner has not provided an adequate
explanation of why Niitsu in combination with the other
references would have led an artisan to the disclosed circuits.
DECISION
We affirm the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 10, and 12
under section 103. We reverse the examiner's rejection of
claims 2-9 and 13-20 under section 103.
- 10 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007