THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GEORGE R. LANGLAND
____________
Appeal No. 96-4007
Application No. 08/294,7691
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9, 16 and 17. Claims 12 through
15 have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b)
as being drawn to a nonelected invention. Claims 8, 10 and 11
have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed August 23, 1994. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/066,047, filed May 25, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007