Appeal No. 97-0628
Application 07/992,428
References Relied on by the Examiner
Reed et al. (Reed) 5,241,671 Aug. 31, 1993
Biles 5,369,763 Nov. 29, 1994
(filed May 26, 1992)
Kucera et al. (Kucera) 4,868,750 Sep. 19, 1989
Chang et al. (Chang) 5,321,833 June 14, 1994
(filed August 29, 1990)
Morita 5,297,042 March 22, 1994
(filed October 5, 1990)
Miyamoto et al. (Miyamoto) 4,943,933 July 24, 1990
Hung et al. (Hung) 5,325,465 June 29, 1994
(filed March 4, 1992)
The Rejection on Appeal
Claims 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 16-20 and 30 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Reed in view of
either Chang or Morita, and Biles and Kucera.
Claims 8, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Reed in view of either Chang or Morita,
and Biles and Kucera, and further in view of either Miyamoto or
Hung.
The Invention
The invention is directed to a method for searching media
articles for reviewing the information content thereof and then
categorizing the subject matter according to predetermined
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007