Interference No. 103,208
Hoshino et al. v. Tanaka
points raised in and evidence presented with Tanaka’s
opposition, there has been no occasion to consider the
substance of paragraphs 5-14, 16, 17, and 19 of the second
Utagawa declaration and Hoshino’s exhibits G, H, and I.
Accordingly, Tanaka’s motion to suppress is dismissed as moot.
- 44 -
Page: Previous 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007