THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 89
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SADAO OIDA, AKIRA YOSHIDA,
YAWARA TAJIMA, and NORIKO TAKEDA
_____________
Appeal No. 94-4265
Application 08/035,9151
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed March 23, 1993. According to applicants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/935,642, filed August 25, 1992, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/810,304, filed
December 19, 1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/697,532, filed April 30, 1991, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/481,717, filed February 15, 1990, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 07/018,794, filed February 19, 1987, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
06/873,856, filed June 11, 1986, now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 06/742,132, filed June 6, 1985,
now abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 06/525,616, filed August 22, 1983, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007