Ex parte EITRHEIM et al. - Page 1




                     THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                     
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   


                                                             Paper No. 20              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                      __________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                       
         Ex parte JOHN K. EITRHEIM, RICHARD B. REIS, STEVE MCMAHAN,                    
          LAWRENCE H. HUDEPOHL, DOUGLAS E. DUSCHATKO,                                  
          TAI D. NGO and JEFFREY BYRNE                                                 
                                      __________                                       
                                  Appeal No. 95-1816                                   
                               Application 07/859,3471                                 
                                      __________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                      __________                                       

          Before, HAIRSTON, BARRETT and FLEMING Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                      
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                
          claims 17 through 24, 26 and 27.                                             


               1Application for patent filed March 27, 1992.                           
                                           1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007