Appeal No. 95-3387 Application No. 08/005,942 of the prior art. The examiner should carefully review this evidence. Conclusion The decision of the examiner refusing to allow claims 1- 15 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting is affirmed. The decision of the examiner refusing to allow claims 1- 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. No time period for taking subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) 16Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007