THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte BENJAMIN L. WOLOZIN
and HAYDEN G. COON
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4464
Application 07/605,7881
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before RONALD H. SMITH, WILLIAM F. SMITH and ELLIS,
Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 20, 21
and 23, all the claims pending in the application.
Claim 20, which is illustrative of the subject matter on
appeal, reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed October 30, 1990. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/487,894, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007