THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte Michael L. BAUGHMAN
____________
Appeal No. 95-5000
Application No. 08/021,8831
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge and
NASE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed February 24, 1993.
According to the appellant, the application is a continuation-
in-part of Application No. 07/911,333, filed July 8, 1992, now
abandoned, which was a continuation of Application No.
07/776,905, filed October 16, 1991, now abandoned, which was a
continuation of Application No. 07/618,153, filed November 23,
1990, now abandoned, which was a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/475,896, filed February 1, 1990, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007