THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KATSUHIRO TSUKAMOTO
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1549
Application 08/296,9881
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's
final rejection of claim 10, Appellant's sole pending claim,
1Application for patent filed August 26, 1994. According
to Appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
07/738,648, filed July 31, 1991 (now abandoned), which is a
continuation of Application 07/662,989, filed February 28, 1991
(now Patent No. 5,047,818), which is a continuation of
Application 07/146,686, filed January 20, 1988 (now abandoned).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007