Appeal No. 96-1549 Application 08/296,988 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for obviousness over the prior art. We 2 reverse. The invention is a semiconductor memory device which includes a continuous buried layer which serves as a barrier against "-ray induced carriers. Claim 10, the sole appealed claim, reads as follows: 10. A semiconductor memory device including a memory sell having a write/read transistor and a charge storage capacitor comprising: a semiconductor substrate formed of a material having a first conductivity type and first impurity concentration, said substrate having a main surface; a field oxide isolation film formed on said main surface for isolating semiconductor elements from each other; a pair of regions of a second conductivity type of said write/read transistor formed on said main surface, a first region of said pair of regions being connected with a bit line and the second region of said pair of regions being connected with one electrode of said charge storage capacitor; a gate formed on said main surface between said pair of regions of said write/read transistor; and a continuous buried layer of the first conductivity type formed to stop " particles having a second impurity concentration higher than said first impurity concentration of said substrate and being continuously formed in said substrate beneath said gate and said pair of regions of said write/read transistor as well as beneath said field oxide isolation film, 2This is the second § 134 appeal in this application. In the first appeal (Appeal No. 93-3432), the Board affirmed the § 103 rejection of a different claim, i.e., claim 9. - 2 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007