Ex parte MANIAR - Page 1




                                                                                     
                                                       Paper No. 28                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                               Ex parte PAPU D. MANIAR                                
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 96-2697                                   
                              Application 08/215,1701                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   _______________                                    
          Before MARTIN, JERRY SMITH and BARRETT, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                 
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4 and 14-26.  Claims              


               Application for patent filed March 21, 1994.  According to appellant,1                                                                     
          this application is a continuation of Application 07/807,327, filed December
          16, 1991.                                                                   
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007