THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALFRED F. HERBERMANN
____________
Appeal No. 97-2999
Application No. 08/338,7141
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 23 through 25, 33 and 35 through 40. 2
1Application for patent filed November 14, 1994.
According to the appellant, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 08/177,091, filed January 3, 1994, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,383,738, which was a continuation of Application
No. 07/840,420, filed February 24, 1992, now abandoned.
2Claims 23, 33 and 35 have been amended subsequent to the
final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007