Ex parte SASAKI et al. - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 97-3918                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/447,901                                                                                                                 


                 is before us in this appeal.   That technique, embodied in the3                                                                                    
                 playback circuit of appellants' Figure 5, employs a variable                                                                           
                 gain gm amplifier 24A (Spec. at 16:11-16), the gain of which                                                                           
                 is switched to a "high gm state during the time intervals T1                                                                           
                 and T2 shown in Fig. 9D" (Spec. at 19:16-19), when the power                                                                           
                 source is turned on and also when head switching occurs (Spec.                                                                         
                 at 18:24 to 19:2).  We note that Figure 9(D) is labeled                                                                                
                 "SECOND gm AMPLIFIER" because Figure 9 is used to illustrate                                                                           
                 the operation of each of the four playback circuits shown in                                                                           
                 Figures 5-8 (Spec. at 17:18 to 18:3), of which Figure 6                                                                                
                 employs two gm amplifiers 24 and 41 (Spec. at 16:17-20).  The                                                                          
                 examiner is therefore incorrect to state that Figure 9 does                                                                            
                 not depict the invention of Figure 5 (Answer at 3).                                                                                    
                          Claim 2, the only independent claim on appeal, reads on                                                                       
                 Figure 5 as follows:                                                                                                                   








                          3Application Serial No. 08/264,473, involved in Appeal                                                                        
                 No. 95-0517, claims another of these techniques.                                                                                       
                                                                       - 4 -                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007