Interference No. 102,668 Exhibit A, a sketch of an assembled transducer, shows two "DRIVE ENDS" which are separated by ceramic stacks and held together by a tie rod, with two outer bars shown connected between the drive ends. Exhibit B is a sketch of an "END MASS" that appears to be one of the "DRIVE ENDS" shown in Exhibit A. Exhibit C, the graph of the test results, has an x axis which is a logarithmic frequency scale between 100 and 10,000 Hz and a y axis which appears to represent "db" values between 0 and -40. Exhibit D consists of photocopies of two photographs of the device Packard says he saw tested in August 1988. Although Packard's signature confirming the success of the tests he observed appears on Exhibits E and F, which show structural details not apparent in Exhibits A, B, and D, the clear meaning of Packard's above-quoted testimony is that the device he saw tested is the device depicted in Exhibits A, B, and D (as opposed to Exhibits E an F). This conclusion is also consistent with the testimony of Pelrin, who explained that in August 1988 he saw a device that was constructed as shown in Exhibits A, B, and D (CR 6-7): 2. To the best of my recollection, during August, 1988, George Cavanagh requested my advice - 12 -Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007