Interference No. 103,036
material and indicate voltage of reissue claims 24 to 29. The
motion relies upon the testimony of Dr. Feder at CR 53 to 57 and
64. Dr. Feder testified that the Burroughs et al. specification
does not disclose means between the conductive layer and the
battery which performs a thermal insulating function to allow
heat generated by the conductive layer to sufficiently heat the
heat-sensitive color indicator material.
As we noted in our decision on item 5, supra, the
Burroughs et al. specification is sufficient to show that the
natural result flowing from the operation of Figure 10 is to
permit the heat generated by the conductive layer to change the
color of the temperature sensitive color indicator material.
Accordingly, for the reasons given in item 5, supra, the motion
is denied as to item 6.
In item 7, the motion urges that the Burroughs et al.
specification does not contain a written description for the “air
pocket" limitation of reissue claims 30 to 32 and 40. The motion
relies upon the testimony of Dr. Feder at CR 65 and 66. With
respect to claims 30 to 32, Feder testified that the Burroughs et
al. specification does not disclose an air pocket as a part of
the temperature sensitive color indicator, the indicator device
10D of Figure 10, but rather discloses the air pocket as being
-49-
Page: Previous 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007