THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 50
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHAN A. VAN DEN BERG, ALBERT J.J. VAN OOYEN, KRIJN RIETVELD,
CORNELIS P. HOLLENBERG, SUNIL DAS and ALBERT DE LEEUW
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0083
Application 07/711,5561
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge and
WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 Application for patent filed May 29, 1991. According to appellants this application is a
continuation of application Serial No. 07/480,102, filed February 14, 1990, now abandoned, and a
continuation of application Serial No. 06/572,414, filed January 19, 1984, now U.S. Patent No. 4,859,596,
issued August 22, 1989 and a continuation of application Serial No. 07/078,539 filed July 28, 1987, now
U.S. Patent No. 4,934,529 issued July 24, 1990 and a continuation of application Serial No. 07/300,608,
filed January 23,1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007