Appeal No. 95-0083 Application 07/711,556 region and a structural gene, whereby said DNA sequence is expressed and said polypeptide is obtained. The references relied on by the examiner are: Hitzeman et al. (Hitzeman) 4,775,622 Oct. 04, 1983 Kurjan et al. (Kurjan) 4,546,082 Oct. 08, 1985 Hollenberg et al. (Hollenberg) 4,859,596 Aug. 22, 1989 Hollenberg et al. (Hollenberg) EP 0 096 430 Dec. 21, 1983 (European Patent Application) Sunil Das, et al. (Das) "A High-Frequency Transformation System for the Yeast Kluyveromyces lactis", Current Genetics, Vol. 6, pgs 123-128 (1982). The issues presented for review are: (1) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 43, 45, 46, 48, 49, 52, 54, 56 and 57 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting over claims 1 and 6 through 12 of U.S. Patent No. 4,859,596; (2) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 47 and 58 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting over claims 1 and 6 through 12 of U.S. Patent No. 4,859,596 considered with Hitzeman; and (3) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 43, 45, 46, 49, 52, 54 and 56 through 58 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Hollenberg (European Patent Application 096 430) in view of Das, Kurjan, and Hitzeman. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007