THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DENNIS P. RILEY, RANDY H. WEISS, WILLIAM L. NEUMANN, ANIL S. MODAK,
PATRICK J. LENNON and KARL W. ASTON
____________
Appeal No. 95-1083
Application No. 08/004,4441
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-3, 6-8, and 12. Claims 4, 5, and 9-11 stand withdrawn from
consideration by the examiner as being directed to the non-elected invention and are not
presented on appeal.
1Application for patent filed January 14, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007